blogs

So, you think you're going to retire...

Bookmark and Share

   I don't know what it's like to climb up to or down from a tractor seat a dozen or more times a day. But I did spend 10 of my post-prime years (i.e., I was getting up there) hopping onto and off a forklift truck dozens of times a night. It takes a toll.
    I was happy to retire from that job a year-and-a-half ago and more than happy to get back to newspapering, which has always been my vocation of choice. I'm semi-retired now, with a part-time job. I'm hardly a trailblazer, but the trail behind me is getting wider and wider as more and more people continue working beyond "normal" retirement age. I know a couple of accountants who plan to never quit. A classmate who retired from selling heavy equipment who still calls on clients every day. A feed salesman who unretired to work the coffee equipment at a Wawa and quit after less than a month. A feed mill owner who retired but said he'd come into the office several times a week. After two weeks, he stopped going to the office. I know former teachers who paint houses. A retired surgeon who farms. A retired chemist who works at volunteering.

Chestnuts for food, furniture, barn beams...

Bookmark and Share
    ...and climate change. The American chestnut was a dominant presence in forests from New England to Alabama, until about 50 years ago, when it was nearly wiped out by chestnut blight, a fungus that showed no mercy
    Researchers have been working on hybridizing the the American Chestnut with the blight-resistant Chinese chestnut for decades. They now have a resistant variety that is 94% American chestnut, and researchers like Purdue's Douglas Jacobs hope reintroduce the tree into existing forests as well as reforesting farmlands throughout the tree's natural range.
    The great thing about chestnuts, according to Jacobs, is that the chestnut grows faster than other species, and it gets bigger, sucking more carbon from the atmosphere.

People say I rant...

Bookmark and Share

     I ranted on for a bit the other day about Food, Inc., a movie I haven't seen yet sort of reviewed, presuming to know what it was about. Food, Inc., is an indictment of Big Ag, which includes Monsanto, Tyson, Cargill, etc., but which I think also includes many of our regular readers. You might say, "It's not right to review a film you haven't seen," and there's a point to that. But in my defense, I would say that a lot of the movie reviews I've read have had almost no resemblance to the movies I've seen.

Using everything but the squawk...

Bookmark and Share

 When they start breeding chickens for feathers, I want to see what the birds look like. And I'd like to know if you can rig them up like a kite to take them to market. If they could float in a 5 mph wind, think of all the trucking costs you could save just by tethering a thousand or so birds to the pickup and flying them to the  processing plant. Which would have to be upwind from the farm, of course.
    Why am I talking about breeding for feathers? It's the hydrogen economy, which may or may not ever be upon us. If it is to be, then carbonized chicken feather fibers could be in demand as a storage medium for hydrogen gas. Keratin, a natural protein found abundantly in chicken feathers, forms strong, hollow tubes when it's heated. This increases the surface area, making an efficient and economical storage medium for hydrogen.
    A 20-gallon carbonized chicken feather tank would add $200 to the cost of a new vehicle. Which is significant, but less so then metalhydrides , which would add about $30,000 to a car's cost, and nothing like the mind-boggling $5.5 million it would take for a tank filled with carbon nanotubes.  A chicken feather report from the American Chemical Society Green Chemistry Institute will run in the Ag Science section of Saturday's edition of Lancaster Farming.

Can you burp "No cow tax?"

Bookmark and Share

     A year ago, the Bush administration's EPA released documents outlining how the Clean Air Act could regulate greenhouse gases. Buried deep in the documents was a single paragraph about the amount of methane released into the atmosphere by bovine belches.

    Using EPA guidelines on the costs of ameliorating various environmental threats, the American Farm Bureau quickly coined the term "cow tax" and figured out how much it would cost farmers if it ever came to be. TheAFB's estimate for an emissions permit would have been $175 for each dairy cow, $87.50 per head of beef cattle, and $20 for each hog.

Today at the White House...

Bookmark and Share

     The Smoker-in-Chief disses tobacco. President Barack Obama has had almost as much press for sneaking cigarettes as he has had for his jump shots. One would assume that he's finally kicked the habit and that he's able to get up and down the court a little faster, but we don't really know for sure.
    We do know for sure that earlier today he signed the toughest anti-smoking bill ever. In a ceremony to mark the signing, he said nine out of ten new smokers are under the age of 18, and he mentioned that he was one of those kids, and he knows how tough it is to quit.

Backyard chickens - trend or no trend?

Bookmark and Share

The Web is all atwitter about backyard chickens, which The Economist says constitute a growing trend in urban areas all across the U.S. Judith Haller of Austin, Tx., for example said she was watching Martha Stewart one day and became envious of Martha's  little flock. She bought some of her own chickens, and now has 13 hens keeping her garden both weed-free and fertilized.

And she gets eggs, too. In April, as part of Austin’s first Funky Chicken Coop Tour, she hosted 637 visitors. And Ms Haller is just one of many, many, many people who have joined the backyard flock movement, according to The Economist article, which is here: http://www.economist.com/research/articlesBySubject/displaystory.cfm?subjectid=478044&story_id=13856313

Stampeding bulls redux...

Bookmark and Share
So farmland is the next hot thing for the investment world, and Shondra Warner is the face of a new agculture. Warner is actually a legitimate farm girl, according to Brian O'Keefe, reporting in the latest edition of Fortune Magazine. O'Keefe says that she is "A Nebraska farm girl who went on to a globetrotting career as a derivatives trader for Goldman Sachs and then as a hedge fund executive in London."

Are the bulls getting ready to stampede again?

Bookmark and Share

Are you looking for a way to grow that pile of cash you're sitting on? How 'bout investing in farmland? People will always have to eat, you know.

Went to the mailbox today and there was the latest copy of Fortune Magazine with the headline, "Why Farmland is Hot." My first reaction was, "Well, it's summer, duh," but they were talking about a different kind of hot. Actually, the big headline, which took up a third of the front page was, "Retire Rich."

Before we get to farmland, here's Fortune's formula for retiring rich - start when you're 25, set aside $400 a month at 7% and when you're 65 you'll have $600,000. I wish I'd have known that when I was 25 and finally crashed the $100-a-week barrier writing about the fantastically ne Haybine in New Holland Machine Co.'s advertising department. Right now, if I'd followed Fortune's advice, I'd be really set.

In step with the Times...

Bookmark and Share

In a New York Times editorial yesterday, the newspaper chided the Obama administration for decimating USDA conservation programs while leaving in place huge subsidy payments to big producers of corn, soybeans, wheat and other crops. Secretary Tom Vilsak has proposed chopping $600 million from conservation programs aimed at helping farmers preserve wetlands, open space and wildlife habitat.

Interestingly, those cuts come out of a $4 billion program urged on the department last year by then-President Bush, characterized by the Times as "...reform-minded on agriculture."

Syndicate content