Livestock Records Are Often Key to Profitability

2/23/2013 7:00 AM

A key to profitability of any livestock operation is a good set of records.

Choosing what type of records to keep for your livestock operation initially starts with looking at what influences profitability of the herd or flock.

Once you decide what affects the profitability, then you can start collecting the records that help you make better informed decisions.

These decisions might include tasks such as how to select the best performing females in your herd or flock, how to identify females that should be culled, or how to identify expenses that could be decreased.

A research study at North Dakota State University, “Critical Control Points for Profitability in Sheep Production,” identified four key points that determine net profit for sheep operations: sufficient volume of production to be efficient, low unit cost of production, adding value to the lambs by feeding them to market weight, and labor efficiency.

These concepts can also be applied to other livestock operations. So, the question now is what types of records should a producer keep to address these profitability points?

When I think of production efficiency, there are several criteria that come to mind. For breeding males, they should be more than just fast growing, muscular and structurally correct.

Any breeding male needs to be reproductively sound. Records that will prove his merit would include the percentage of females he settled in two heat cycles, growth and performance of his offspring pre- and post-weaning, and the performance of those offspring as sires and dams.

For females, I might look at total weaning weight of her offspring at a given age as well as post-weaning growth, muscling and structural correctness.

To arrive at this information, producers should keep detailed records: birth date, sire, dam, sex, type of birth (single, twin triplet), birth weight, plus any comments about the birth.

Producers should also collect weaning weights and post-weaning weights. Additionally, ultrasound scan data for loin eye area and depth plus fat thickness are very useful for evaluating production parameters.

To address sufficient volume of production to be efficient, we need to realize that not only do we have certain expectations of each individual female and male in the herd or flock, but we also need to own a large enough herd or flock that we can spread the expenses across a larger number of females.

Some expenses are fixed regardless of the number of females on the farm, while others are flexible and will vary based on the number of females.

An example of a fixed expense would be a mortgage payment. A flexible expense example would be feed. The mortgage cost stays the same, but the feed cost increases as the number of animals increases.

Operation expenses will have a large impact on the overall profitability of an operation. The North Dakota research study looked at net profit across a number of years, and the data suggest that producers should spend time looking closely at measuring and controlling operation expenses.

Feed costs are typically one of the biggest expenses in an operation, so practices such as livestock selection to decrease grain consumption (an expensive feed resource) and methods to increase and improve pasture production can make a difference in the bottom line at the end of the year.

A low unit cost of production takes into account two aspects of the operation: total production and total costs.

You can consider your unit cost of production in several ways, depending on the product that you are selling. For producers selling feeder animals, you might look at cost to raise an animal to weaning age.

If you are looking at selling market animals, you might want to consider the cost per pound of gain. For breeding stock, you might look at the costs associated with raising a replacement female.

Adding value to young stock by feeding them out would take a closer look at cost to finish an animal to a specified weight compared with the value of that animal at marketing.

Low-cost weight gains on pasture could be compared with feeding efficiencies (pound of feed needed for a pound of gain) in a feedlot.

Pasture growth rates will be slower, and thus feeder animals take longer to reach market weight compared with fast-growing feedlot animals that are consuming more expensive grain rations.

Labor efficiency can be largely dependent on the operation facilities. Obviously, there is a cost to improv ing facilities, but that cost can be justified if labor cost is reduced by more than the cost of the improvement.

For example, handling small square bales can be time consuming. By purchasing a round bale feeder and switching to large bales, a great savings can be realized in the amount of time spent feeding supplemental forages.

However, if this switch also requires investing in new equipment to handle the larger bales, the lower labor cost may not justify the additional expense.

A key to any record-keeping system is to choose a method that is both easy to use as well as easily accessible. Whether you are using a handwritten system or a sophisticated computer program, it needs to be kept up to date to make the best use of the records.

Income and expense records can be very valuable when they are compared over a number of years.

As we start this new calendar year, are there ways that you can do a better job of keeping records for your operation? Do you need to become more efficient at keeping records? Do you need to keep more detailed records? Or, do you need to develop a new system for keeping those records?

Plan now to be more profitable in 2013.

Melanie Barkley is a Penn State Extension educator in Bedford County.


Has the Food and Drug Administration done enough to revise its produce safety rule?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Unsure

User Submitted Photos

View photos      Submit your photos

11/1/2014 | Last Updated: 4:15 AM